VoiceHub Arena
VERIFIED FULL RESULTS / SEPTEMBER 2026

One dataset.
Every voice, measured.

Compare text-to-speech models on the complete English Seed-TTS-Eval split. Original and new reference-conditioned configurations are labeled separately. Inspect transcripts, available recordings and explicit generation failures.

EVALUATION PROTOCOLSeed-TTS-Eval · English

Whisper-large-v3 transcription
Fixed provider voices & references
Same 1,088 texts per configuration

Read the methodology ↓
Complete configurations—
Texts per model1,088
Verified recordings—
Evaluation hardwareA100 40 GB

Loading the latest published results…

A CLOSER LOOK

The voices, side by side.

All models in one view. Change the metric or search a model family; the complete table stays below.

Word error rate

Loading chart…

Choose models
View the values behind this chart
ModelWER95% confidence interval

The full comparison

Corpus error rates. Lower WER, CER and RTF are better.

Loading results…

Reference badges identify new experiments with fixed reference audio and independent model implementations; the original provider configurations remain separate rows. Select a model name to listen. WER/CER intervals are 95% prompt bootstrap intervals; small rank differences may not be meaningful. ● Review marks a confirmed or unresolved quality issue. CosyVoice now uses the verified corrected full run; its original invalidated score remains archived.

HOW TO READ THESE RESULTS

One experiment. A transparent record.

All recordings & records ↗

Matched evaluation

Each completed configuration is evaluated on the same 1,088 English texts with seed 42 and one repeat. WER and CER aggregate edit counts across the corpus, rather than averaging shard percentages. Recognition uses pinned Whisper-large-v3 and whisper_english normalization.

What the scores mean

WER measures word edits; CER measures character edits. Both estimate intelligibility through ASR. They do not measure naturalness or speaker similarity. Fixed provider voices and references mean this is not the official zero-shot speaker-identity/SIM protocol.

Keep the difficult cases

CosyVoice’s vocoder defect is repaired and its complete corrected result is shown. Reference-conditioned Dia and official Llasa results are included after full verification. Llasa 8B no-audio failures remain in the corpus scores as deletions. The old Multilingual Llasa run is archived and excluded from the active selection. Empty ASR text alone does not prove silence. Successful inference is not a guarantee of good speech.

Metric definitions & reproducibility

MER / WIL / WIP: match error rate, word information lost and word information preserved. Lower MER/WIL and higher WIP are better. Exact match: fraction of normalized target/transcript pairs that match exactly.

RTF: summed synthesis seconds / summed audio seconds; below 1 is faster than real time. Latency p50/p95: synthesis time percentiles. Silence/clipping: measured signal diagnostics, not subjective quality ratings.

ASR: Systran/faster-whisper-large-v3, revision edaa852ec7e145841d8ffdb056a99866b5f0a478; CUDA FP16, English, beam 5, temperature 0, no VAD or previous-text conditioning. 95% intervals: 1,000 prompt-cluster bootstrap resamples, seed 42.

Coverage verification · Audio hash verification · Original Seed-TTS-Eval